Posters
« Back
18F-FDG PET/CT in cervical cancer assessment
EP29139
Poster Title: 18F-FDG PET/CT in cervical cancer assessment
Submitted on 14 Sep 2018
Author(s): A Rabone, S Hasso, A Jacques, S Natas, J Wilson, A Winship, G Cook, O Westerland
Affiliations: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
This poster was presented at BIR Annual Congress 2018
Poster Views: 1,126
View poster »


Poster Information
Abstract: Background:
18F-FDG PET/CT is a recognised useful tool in baseline staging/response assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer however, patient selection is important. The 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) cervical cancer guidelines recommend 18F-FDG-PET/CT in staging for FIGO stage IB2+ disease, with follow-up 18F-FDG-PET/CT at 3-6 months following treatment completion. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is also indicated in suspected recurrent/metastatic disease. We conducted an audit of 18F-FDG PET/CT utilisation by a tertiary gynae-oncology centre.
Methods:
Weekly MDT lists between April 2017-March 2018 provided a cohort of cervical cancer patients who had received 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Electronic patient records, imaging requests and reports (pelvic MRI and staging CT where applicable) were reviewed and baseline clinical and imaging staging results recorded. 100% compliance with guidelines was sought.
Results:
24/32 (75%) 18F-FDG-PET/CT studies were compliant with guidelines. Most 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans were performed for baseline staging. Of those which were not compliant all were for staging of FIGO stage IB1 disease where there were additional concerns at MDT e.g. high-grade disease on biopsy, suspicious sub-centimetre lymph nodes or other concerning findings detected on initial staging CT /MRI. Of the non-compliant studies, 1/8 detected FDG avidity outside the cervix (synchronous lung adenocarcinoma where spiculate lung lesion was detected at baseline CT).
Conclusion:
The importance of using 18F-FDG-PET/CT selectively is highlighted, to minimise unnecessary radiation exposures and avoid false negative results e.g. assessment of sub-centimetre lymph nodes. These results will be presented at local MDM audit meeting and adherence to NCCN guidelines recommended, with repeat audit in one year.
Summary: This was a single centre retrospective audit of compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for PET/CT in cervical cancer. References: 1. Royal College of Radiologists. Evidence based indications for use of PET-CT in the United Kingdom, 2016.
2. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Management of cervical cancer: A national clinical guideline. NHS, 2008.
3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Version 1.2017, 2016.
4. Kitajima, K. et al. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Endometrial Cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2008, Vol. 190. 1652-1658
Report abuse »
Questions
Ask the author a question about this poster.
Ask a Question »

Creative Commons

Related Posters


Audit of Achilles tendon ultrasound: appropriateness and timeliness
Akash Sharma, Denis Remedios

A Pictoral review of active and long-standing Crohn's Disease
Afreen Ameer Hussain1, Arafat Muhammed Haris2

Is MRI Arthrogram a reliable investigation for Posterior Labrum tears of Shoulder?
R.Saini, S.Chinna, C Sharma, V.Jain, S.Kumar, R.Kothari, S Chau, C Fang

Peer Review Audit of Accuracy of Radiology Reports at Croydon University Hospital 2020
Dr Sophie Canham and Dr Ketul Patel

Radiation dose in paediatric CT during and after changes
Berglind Eik Ólafsdóttir, Jónína Guðjónsdóttir