Posters
« Back
An audit of documentation and efficacy of Ultrasound-guided soft tissue biopsy
EP26440
An audit of documentation and efficacy of Ultrasound-guided soft tissue biopsy
Submitted on 14 Sep 2017

Phey Ming Yeap, Andrew Snoddon, Harun Gupta, Philip Robinson
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
This poster was presented at BIR Annual Congress 2017
Poster Views: 28
View poster »
Poster Abstract
Purpose:
To audit the documentation and efficacy of ultrasound-guided soft tissue biopsy.

Standard/Targets:
100% compliance documenting needle gauge, number of passes, pathology result. All cases should have an image with needle demonstrating the biopsy site. At least 90% of the biopsies should be adequate for pathological diagnosis.

Method:
A retrospective audit on ultrasound-guided soft tissue biopsy performed in our center from May 2016 to December 201.. The radiology reports, images and the sarcoma MDT entries on Computerised Radiology Information System were reviewed. Results were compared with previous-audit that was carried out for the procedures performed from December 2015 to May 2016

Results:
115 ultrasound-guided biopsies were included in the current audit and 50 in the first cycle. There was no statistical significant difference between the first and second audit cycle in documentation of needle gauge and number of passes, and obtaining sonographic images with needle demonstrating the biopsy site (96% vs. 93%, p=0.31; 100% vs. 96%, p=0.32; 82% vs. 89%, p=0.25; respectively). 92% had documented pathology results on the MDT entries.

Of the 165 cases, 16gauge needle was used in 72% and 18gauge in 20%. Two passes were carried out in 52% of the cases, three passes in 39% and only 3% with four passes. 96% of the biopsy sample were sufficient for pathological analysis and in 95% were diagnostic in determining benign/malignant tumours.

Conclusions:
Ultrasound-guided soft tissue biopsy has a high diagnostic yield. There was good documentation rate although 100% compliance was not achieved.


Dangoor A, Seddon B, Gerrand C, Grimer R, Whelan J. Judson I UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res 2016. doi:10.1186/s13569-016-0060-4

Kasraeian S, Allison DC, Ahlmann ER, Fedenko A, Menendez LR. A comparison of fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, and surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of extremity soft tissue masses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 2992-3002

Wu JS, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ, Shetty SK, Hochman MG. Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core needle biopsy? Radiology 2008; 248: 962-970

Kim SY, Chung HW, Oh TS, Lee JS. Practical guidelines for ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of soft tissue lesions: transformation from beginner to specialist. Korean J Radiol 2017; 18: 361-369
Report abuse »
Questions
Ask the author a question about this poster.
Ask a Question »

Creative Commons