Posters
« Back
Angioedema Vanishing Into Thin Air
EP26858
Poster Title: Angioedema Vanishing Into Thin Air
Submitted on 08 Feb 2018
Author(s): Amber N. Pepper MD, Dennis K. Ledford MD, Richard F. Lockey MD
Affiliations: Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
This poster was presented at USF Research Day 2018
Poster Views: 367
View poster »


Poster Information
Abstract: Introduction: A thorough history and physical exam is paramount to elucidate the etiology of angioedema.

Methods: A 53-year-old African-American male with hypertension presents 1 day after discharge from a prior hospitalization for suspected enalapril-induced angioedema with worsening neck and facial swelling, cough, hoarseness, and right upper eyelid swelling. Physical examination reveals right-sided edema of the neck, face and upper eyelid with subcutaneous crepitus. He exhibits no rash. He is coughing, but respirations are non-labored. A chest radiograph shows bilateral subcutaneous emphysema (air) with probable pneumomediastinum. Nasolaryngoscopy reveals no definitive abnormalities, but a microperforation of the laryngopharynx is suspected. He improves with antitussives and weaning of previously initiated systemic corticosteroids. He was previously hospitalized for 5 days for swelling which developed after 1 week of cough, chills, and sore throat secondary to an upper respiratory infection. During this prior hospitalization, enalapril was discontinued and systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics were prescribed with slight improvement. Two nasolaryngoscopies showed right parapharyngeal and pyriform edema, and a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the neck revealed right preglottic, subglottic, and supraglottic edema.

Results: Subcutaneous emphysema due to a micorperforation of the laryngopharynx is an important, though rare, diagnostic consideration and can be difficult to differentiate from angioedema. The initial angioedema was likely caused by enalapril, given the time course of the prior admission and absence of subcutaneous crepitus. A microperforation, secondary either to excessive coughing or trauma during nasolaryngoscopies, likely caused the subsequent, rapid swelling and subcutaneous emphysema.

Conclusion: Subcutaneous emphysema is an important differential diagnosis in the evaluation of angioedema.
Summary: A thorough history and physical exam is paramount to elucidate the etiology of angioedema.References: 1. Maunder RJ, Pierson DJ, Hudson LD. Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144(7):1447-53.

2. Kouritas VK, Papagiannopoulos K, Lazaridis G, et al. Pneumomediastinum. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(Suppl 1): S44–S49.
Report abuse »
Questions
Ask the author a question about this poster.
Ask a Question »

Creative Commons

Related Posters


Rare Presentation of a Rare Tumour: Case Report of Sclerosing Stromal Tumour with Meig’s Syndrome and Raised Serum Cancer Antigen 125.
Kushal Joshi, Tauseef Ashraf

Pressure Injury
Pressure Injury Team

Accelerated Ageing in Depression: A Study of Two Cohorts
Mathew A. Harris, Laura de Nooij, Xueyi Shen, Toni-Kim Clarke, Riccardo Marioni, Simon R. Cox, Emma L. Hawkins, Mark J. Adams, Liana Romaniuk, Stephen M. Lawrie, James H. Cole, Andrew M. McIntosh and Heather C. Whalley

Introducing ExHiBITT – Exploring Host microBIome inTeraction in Twins-, a colon multiomic cohort study
Marina Mora-Ortiz, Hajir Ibraheim, Ruth C. E. Bowyer, Sarah Metrustry, Nicholas Powell, Jeremy Sanderson, Tim D. Spector, Kerrin S. Small*, Claire J. Steves*

Digiceuticals
Helana Lutfi and Shaban Nuredini