« Back
Automated in-gel digestion on a commercial autosampler directly coupled to nanoLC-MS/MS
Poster Title: Automated in-gel digestion on a commercial autosampler directly coupled to nanoLC-MS/MS
Submitted on 28 Aug 2015
Author(s): Achermann François, Bolliger Reto, Buchs Natasha, Doiron Nicholas, Lagache Braga Sophie, Heller Manfred, Boehm Guenter
Affiliations: University of Bern, Department of Clinical Research, Proteomics & Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Bern, Switzerland : CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland
This poster was presented at ASMS 2015
Poster Views: 1,566
View poster »

Poster Information
Abstract: Methods
We have adapted a manual in-gel digestion protocol, including reduction, alkylation and acid-labile detergent assisted trypsin digestion of proteins, to be performed on a PAL RTC liquid handling – autosampler system (CTC Analytics AG, Switzerland). The system is equipped with park stations for a syringe tool and samples/reagents, a cooled tray stack, an evaporation tool, a heatable incubator with orbital shaking capability, a vortex mixer, a syringe wash station, a centrifuge, and a LC injection valve. The current PAL RTC setup treats batches of 6 gel samples within 7 hours. Peptide extracts in HPLC vials are transferred to a nanoLC-orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Germany) or can directly be injected by the PAL system. Proteins were identified and quantified with MaxQuant software.

Preliminary data
A 12-protein molecular weight standard (Bio-Rad) was separated over the entire width of a 12.5% SDS-PAGE at two concentrations corresponding to 1ng or 5ng of each protein standard present in vertical slices of 1.5mm width cut from the gel. Four batches, including three slices of each protein concentration, were processed by an experienced human operator or on the PAL RTC system during four consecutive days. Protein yields were determined by identification and quantification with MaxQuant software. The low molecular weight proteins (Mr <20 kDa) were not consistently identified from the 1ng samples with both procedures. This is a known problem with the gel-LC-MS/MS approach. Keratin contaminations were very similar with both procedures and protein concentrations, indicating that keratin proteins were introduced into the samples before the in-gel digestion process. One-way Anova test was used to compare MaxQuant derived non-normalized protein intensities of batches and procedures with Tukey's honestly significant difference criterion to evaluate statistical significance (alpha = 0.05). No statistically significant differences in protein yield between batches and between procedures were found. The average coefficients of variation of the 12 standard proteins were 19.4% and 11.8% at 1ng protein, and 5.8% and 6.5% at 5ng for the manual and the automated procedure, respectively. These results indicate that the PAL RTC automated in-gel digestion protocol performs as well as an experienced human operator, with potentially a better reproducibility achieved on the PAL system when dealing with low protein concentrations. The next step is the direct coupling of the PAL system to the nanoLC-MS/MS system, which will enable to operating on a 24/24 hours, 7/7 days schedule.
Summary: SDS-PAGE separates protein samples from LC-MS incompatible contaminations, and is frequently used to fractionate proteins of entire proteomes. One disadvantage is that gel lanes have to be cut into many slices, followed by in-gel digestion of proteins and extraction of peptides. The number of these gel slices goes into the hundreds, rendering this process very repetitive and prone to mistakes and errors during sample handling. Automation reduces such risks and improves reproducibility.Report abuse »
Ask the author a question about this poster.
Ask a Question »

Creative Commons

Related Posters

BAT Molecular Imaging with SPECT-CT, PET-CT, PET-MRI and Fluorescence-PET: A Systematic Review of the Literature Data
Tarik Z Belhocine, MD., Ph.D *, Albert A Driedger, MD., Ph.D **, Jean-Luc Urbain, MD., Ph.D ***

Multiplex miRNA Profiling for Biomarker Discovery and Verification Studies Using the FirePlex® Platform
M. Tackett, B. Heinrich, I. Diwan, G. Tejada, C. Rafferty, E. Atabakhsh, and D. Pregibon

Accelerating high-throughput screening with FirePlex®-HT:An automatable, multiplex immunoassay using FirePlex® Particle Technology
A. Perea, B. Heinrich, W. Austin, C. Rafferty, M. Camilleri, L. To, E. Atabakhsh, and D. Pregibon

PEAKS™ Software for the processing of timsTOF Pro PASEF data: identification and label-free quantitation
Markus Lubeck(1), Heiner Koch(1), Scarlet Beck(1), Paul Savage(2), Oliver Raether(1), Pierre-Olivier Schmit(2) Paul Shan (3) and Gary Kruppa (4)

Plasma proteomic profiling one year postpartum of women with Pre-eclampsia shows dysregulated cardiometabolic profile
Fatma S. Abad, Antigoni Manousopoulou, Diana J. Garay-Baquero, Brian R. Birch, Bas B. van Rijn, Spiros D. Garbis and Bashir A. Lwaleed