Posters
« Back
Horizontal Ridge split with simultaneous implant placement in knife edge ridges: our experience
EP37262
Poster Title: Horizontal Ridge split with simultaneous implant placement in knife edge ridges: our experience
Submitted on 18 May 2021
Author(s): Dr Mohamad Awadlla, Dr Nyer Firdoose, Dr Omar Alabood
Affiliations: Consultant implantologist, consultant maxillo facial surgeon, resident periodontist
This poster was presented at saudi international periodontics conference 2020
Poster Views: 306
View poster »


Poster Information
Abstract: Rehabilitation of edentulous ridges using dental implants is the most demanding and sought-after treatment modality with patients and dental surgeons.

The presence of adequate width and height of bone is pertinent for successful installation and osseointegration of dental implants and we have come a long way to compensate the width of defective ridges for implant installation.

Horizontal bone augmentation using ridge split technique was first introduced by Dr. Hilt Tatum almost three decades ago. Although there are many methods for ridge correction horizontally, the ridge split and expansion remains the most widely preferred.

In this script we would like to share our experience of ridge split and simultaneous implant installation technique in over 57 cases.

This technique is associated with high success and survival rates of 95-97%. Studies by Crespi et al 2015 success rate was 97%, Santagata et al 2015 & Tang et al 2015 showed 93.2% and 95.6% success rate respectively. Therefore, the ultimate objective is restoration of functional requirement.
Summary: For a successful outcome of implants a stable placement is pertinent, the minimum alveolar bone should be larger 6mm to ensure the circum-implant bone width of at least 1-1.5mm.

Tooth extraction often leads to considerable bone resorption during the healing stage rendering the loss of ideal bone width.

When managing severe bone deficiency in the horizontal width of alveolar ridges the use of GBR techniques alone can be limited or challenging, although block grafting is a defi
References: 1. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(suppl): 49–70.
Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Sammartino G, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation in localized alveolar deficient sites: a retrospective case series. Implant Dent. 2012;21: 175–185.
Arau jo M, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J ClinPeriodontol. 2005;32:212–218.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;1(suppl 2):136–159.
McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol. 2007;78:377–396.
Tolstunov L. Classification of the Alveolar Ridge Width: Implant-Driven Treatment Considerations for the Horizontally Deficient Alveolar Ridges. J Oral Impla
Report abuse »
Questions
Ask the author a question about this poster.
Ask a Question »

Creative Commons